So a rapper who goes by the name "Young Thug" is on trial for, in effect, being an organized crimester and they're using some of his lyrics against him. One interesting part of the story is that news reports always refer to him as "Young Thug" and not by his legal name. USA Today, for example...
ATLANTA – Rapper Young Thug, accused by prosecutors of co-founding a criminal street gang responsible for violent crimes and using his songs and social media to promote it, is set to go to trial starting Monday.
(the article does give his legal name, Jeffery Lamar Williams, but does not use it otherwise)
His fellow rapper Gunna was also charged.
Young Thug trial is expected to last months, with his involvement in Young Slime Life (YSL) at the center of alleged criminal activity.
So Young Thug and Gunna go to trial for violent crimes. If you were defending them would your first move be to say they can't possibly get an impartial jury?
Lyrics example:
Tryna rob, better have a 100 motherfuckin' plans
I kill a punk ho, she getting found by her dad
Hickory, dickory, motherfuckin' dock
Bitches just look at my motherfuckin' watch
Bitches, they like when I cook up them blocks
Get away with murder like a motherfuckin' cop
Now writing or performing a violent song doesn't make you guilty of violence. But if somebody says (or sings) "I'm gonna kill that muhfucker" and then that muhfucker turns up dead, I'd say the threat (or lyrics) are fair game for the prosecution. Not proof yet, but certainly collaborating evidence.
I suspect some, including maybe ACLU will object on First Amendment grounds, but as I see it if you call yourself "Young Thug" and you act like a young thug, and you write about doing thugish things, there's a good chance you're a thug - even if you're also an entertainer.